Why Conservatives Claim “Media Bias”, Example #6

I saw this one while cruising the Internet. 

I mean, seriously, these media people must really think we’re all stupid or somethin’!

Here’s the story in question, concerning Dear Leader’s visit to Montana to push his outright socialist health care “reform” (note the emphasis, provided by me):

Obama denounces emphasis on health care protests

By LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press

BELGRADE, Mont. – Trying to lower the temperature of the health care fight, President Barack Obama on Friday denounced news media emphasis on angry protesters at town hall meetings.

Obama ventured west for the latest of his own town hall-style events, fielding polite but occasionally tough questions — one man declaring the president couldn’t pay for his plan without raising taxes. Tieless and rolling up his sleeves in campaign mode, Obama pitched his overhaul plan to a crowd in an airport hangar near Bozeman.

The president didn’t deny that there have been angry outbursts by foes of his plan at town halls featuring Democratic lawmakers this month. But he said that was hardly the whole story.

“TV loves a ruckus,” Obama said. “What you haven’t seen on TV and what makes me proud are the many constructive meetings going on all over the country.”

While hundreds demonstrated outside, there was no sign of protesters on the airstrip where Air Force One landed or inside the hangar. Obama has another town hall Saturday in Grand Junction, Colo.

Friday’s crowd, estimated by the White House at about 1,300 people, was mostly supportive, cheering Obama frequently, though he did get a few pointed questions. One came from Randy Rathie, who called himself “a proud NRA member,” referring to the National Rifle Association, and said he got most of his news from cable TV.

“You can’t tell us how you’re going to pay for this,” Rathie said of Obama’s health care overhaul. “The only way you’re going to get that money is raise our taxes.”

“You are absolutely right,” Obama said. “I can’t cover another 46 million people for free. I can’t do that. We’re going to have to find money from somewhere.”

He noted a congressional estimate that legislation being considered in the Senate could cost $800 billion to $900 billion over 10 years.

Obama has proposed higher taxes for families earning more than $250,000 a year. He said there were also other ways to find money, including streamlining the system and eliminating what he said were subsidies to insurance companies.

“But your point is well-taken,” Obama said. “I appreciate your question and the respectful way you asked it.”

Later, Rathie told CNN he was “well-impressed” with how Obama handled his question. “Now he’s given me his word, personally, that he’s not going to raise my taxes,” Rathie said, but at the same time, “they’re trying to put in a program that they don’t even understand.”

Another participant, who said his job was selling health-insurance policies, asked Obama why he had changed his strategy from one of reaching out to insurance companies to “vilifying” them.

“My intent is not to vilify insurance companies,” Obama said. “I say, ‘Let’s work with the existing system.'” But he said some bad practices of insurance companies “are tough on people” and “have to change,” including such things as denying coverage for pre-existing conditions.

It’s difficult, he said, to achieve true reform “unless we’ve got everybody covered.”

The president kicked off a four-state Western push for his plan with a pointed joke: He said Montana has bears, moose and elk, and “in Washington, you just have mostly bull.”

Minutes after Obama landed, a downpour began, making it difficult to hear inside the metal-roofed hangar. But the rain quickly let up. Tickets were distributed on a first-come, first-served basis to residents of Bozeman and Belgrade, with a limit of two to a family.

The president appeared ready to campaign. He showed up in a suit, but no tie. As he began to take questions, he took off his coat and rolled up his sleeves.

“I know there’s been a lot of attention paid to some of the town hall meetings that are going on around the country, especially when tempers flare,” Obama said.

He said that what wasn’t being shown were the gatherings in which people “are coming together and having a civil, honest, often difficult conversation about how we can improve the system.”

Obama aimed part of his pitch at Americans who already have health insurance.

“Most of us have insurance, and most of us think, knock on wood, and think: ‘I’m going to stay healthy,'” Obama said.

He cited examples in which people have lost their insurance, including when going from job to job and because of pre-existing conditions.

Obama made his latest appearance as a prominent ally, John Podesta, said the high-decibel attacks are designed to destroy his presidency rather than merely defeat health care legislation.

At a breakfast with reporters in Washington, Podesta predicted such tactics would backfire on Republicans and give the president a chance to “capture the center of the debate.”

Podesta, who heads the Center for American Progress and played a key role in last winter’s presidential transition, said the time for bipartisan negotiations in the Senate is drawing to a close. When lawmakers return in September, he said, “either they have to have a deal or he (Obama) has to say, ‘This is what it is.'”

A close legislative ally of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., told WJPA-AM Radio in western Pennsylvania that Congress is going to “do it right” when it comes to passing health care legislation. But he said it’s not clear how soon that will be.

There have been numerous missed deadlines. But the goal of Democratic leaders is to pass a health care bill in time for Obama to sign it this year.

Murtha said lawmakers are telling Pelosi not to rush passage.

Underscoring the fire around the issue, Obama was met in Montana by TV and print advertisements from a group called Conservatives for Patients’ Rights urging opposition to a new public insurance plan supported by Obama that would compete with private insurers.

The American College of Surgeons also weighed in by criticizing comments Obama made in New Hampshire and at a news conference last month suggesting that doctors might be motivated by profit to amputate a diabetic’s foot or remove a child’s tonsils.

And Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele issued a statement, saying: “Americans simply aren’t buying his efforts to repackage his government-run experiment.”

Now, here’s the text in the link that I used to get to the story, placed front-and-center on Yahoo.com:

Obama town hall in Montana: No rage, inside or out

Here’s a picture of the link (in the event you don’t believe me):

Laughable Yahoo Link

Laughable Yahoo Link

Yeah, I guess hundreds of protesters outside the hanger doesn’t count as “rage.”

And as for the assertion that there were no protesters on the airstrip, that is just completely laughable.  OF COURSE THERE WEREN’T ANY PROTESTERS ON THE AIRSTRIP, YOU MORONS!  SECURITY WOULDN’T LET THEM IN!


And we’ve already seen that in his previous “town hall,” they’re staged and packed pre-selected people and questions.  One of which was the daughter of a woman who was the head of some organization titled: “Women for Obama.”

Double duh!

As for the following:

“You are absolutely right,” Obama said. “I can’t cover another 46 million people for free. I can’t do that. We’re going to have to find money from somewhere.”

Notice how there was no follow-up in the article?  I’d like to know specifically where Baby Doc Obama is going to “find” money in a government that is running up MASSIVE deficits, and is having a hard time getting Saudi Arabia and China to purchase its debt.

Maybe under Dear Leader’s mattress he has a trillion in change?  No?  Maybe the couches in the White House (the one that still aren’t out being cleaned after Bill Clinton left stains all over them)?

But what, pray tell, has this bimbo Liz Sidoti written about the protests directed at Bush in the past?

Protesters May Not Have Swearing-In Spot

By Liz Sidoti, Associated Press

WASHINGTON – The park service has given the Presidential Inaugural Committee clearance to erect bleachers along parts of Pennsylvania Avenue where an anti-war group had requested permits to stage a large-scale protest during President Bush’s parade.

The A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition had applied for permits to assemble, and in some cases build bleachers, along parts of the historic street that stretches from the Capitol to the White House.

The National Park Service has not acted on the coalition’s permits.

However, angry coalition officials argued Friday that permitting the inaugural committee to build bleachers in several open spaces, such as Freedom Plaza, across from the White House, and in front of the FBI headquarters and Justice Department, prohibits the coalition from gathering in such areas to stage their large demonstrations.

“The goal, from the beginning, was equal access to Pennsylvania Avenue,” Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, a representative of the Partnership for Civil Justice, which is working on behalf of A.N.S.W.E.R, said at a news conference. “We can’t have what the PIC gets. They’ve issued a permit to another group for the same space we asked for.”

Bill Line, a spokesman for park service’s National Capital Region, said the coalition’s complaints are premature.

“Just because PIC was granted a permit for construction of bleachers does not automatically in any way, shape or form preclude A.N.S.W.E.R. from being issued a permit,” he said.

“We, the National Park Service, fully expect that we, the National Park Service, will issue a permit to A.N.S.W.E.R. for designated portions of the Pennsylvania Avenue sidewalks. In fact, we have had discussions with them where we have stated this directly.”

He said the agency has an obligation to ensure that the public and demonstrators, regardless of their messages, are “fully allowed onto the many open areas of the Pennsylvania Avenue sidewalks on Jan. 20.”

Coalition officials say they may consider a legal challenge to ensure access to a swath of space along Pennsylvania Ave.

“This is an attempt to disrupt the mobilization,” said Brian Becker, the national coordinator of the group, whose acronym stands for Act Now to Stop War and End Racism. “We will not surrender this right without a fight.”

Tracey Schmitt, an inaugural committee spokeswoman, said: “The parade is just one of the week’s events that will provide access to the general public.”

Well, she was quick to identify how protesters are moved out of the way back when Bush was president, now wasn’t she?  And it is really funny, protesters were front-and-center in her piece when she was slamming Bush.  I guess “equal access” isn’t such a big deal for people who protest the obvious object of her carnal affection.

I guess these people think we don’t bother to read, or think.

I hope no one wonders why more and more people are switching to Fox News for their information.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: